While a little bit cheeky, it seems pretty reasonable to add the volunteer ski patrollers to the unit. As the brief stated the overwhelming similarities outweighs the differences and this resonates for me. I know some ski patrollers too and the volunteers are treated as totally equals. Most of the time volunteers were once full time patrollers at the MTN, pretty much the only way u get that job. Also the mountains are not legally able to operate w/o patrollers, so it seems you'd want all patrollers in the union. With all that said, what are your thoughts on the decision? If you don't support adding them to the bargaining unit, why?
While a little bit cheeky, it seems pretty reasonable to add the volunteer ski patrollers to the unit. As the brief stated the overwhelming similarities outweighs the differences and this resonates for me. I know some ski patrollers too and the volunteers are treated as totally equals. Most of the time volunteers were once full time patrollers at the MTN, pretty much the only way u get that job. Also the mountains are not legally able to operate w/o patrollers, so it seems you'd want all patrollers in the union. With all that said, what are your thoughts on the decision? If you don't support adding them to the bargaining unit, why?